Taking an individual’s life is a heinous crime that devastates family members, communities, and society as a whole. The severe punishment serves being a deterrent to prospective offenders and seeks to copyright the sanctity of human life.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative from the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. So, the competent authority of the parent department of your petitioner and the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount on the petitioner and pay back the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to your petitioner to which He's entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority from the respondent can be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits in the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
Intentional Murder: The key factor of Section 302 PPC will be the need of intention. It indicates that the offender must have the intention to cause the death with the target. Intent could be premeditated or could be formed for the time being with the crime.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Specified the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been on the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally sound, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really issue to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case with the petitioners for promotion could be viewed as, however, we've been apparent in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, issue to availability of vacancy issue towards the approval from the competent authority.
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Provided the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been of the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally seem, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really topic to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case with the petitioners for promotion may be deemed, however, we've been distinct inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, topic to availability of vacancy subject to your approval with the competent authority.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It's also a very well-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty with the accused who intentionally murdered the target.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar issue. When they sue their landlord, the court must make use of the previous court’s decision in implementing the legislation. This example of case regulation refers to 2 cases listened to during the state court, in the same level.
Online access for the case management system to the Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases could be searched using name or case number.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent as well as case under appeal, Probably overruling the previous case regulation by setting a fresh precedent of higher authority. This could come about several times as being the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first of your High Court of Justice, later of the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his growth on the concept of estoppel starting in the High Trees case.
Finally, an important contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration with the Court under Article 184 (three), has actually been setting a precedent which allows for much easier access to the public to solution the superior courts and also the subordinate courts on environment related issues.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility website for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, plus the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release to be a legally identified conviction. Read more
It is additionally important to note that granting of seniority to some civil servant without the actual length of service pretty much violates all the service construction for a civil servant inducted in Grade 17 by claiming this kind of benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher quality, which is neither the intention from the law nor in the equity. Read more